Firstly you missed so many points: what do you mean by racism? Do you believe in a multicultural utopia? Do you think different group racial/ethnic groups can live harmoniously within one border is a model for a successful civilisation? If yes, I'm afraid you cannot be any more wrong. Diversity is a source of conflict and tension; more diverse the nation is the lower the social cohesion and trust there is. The overall living standard is also greatly reduced. Moreover, the segregation worsens, because each group want to be with their own. I recommend reading Robert Putnam's 'Bowling Alone' on this.
Let alone, I haven't even touched on race differences in intelligence. Some groups are not as bright as others. This why low IQ nations are third world - regardless of how much charity we throw at it.
Secondly, calling out antisemitism is not identity politics, but Jews are using it elevate themselves into higher echelon of society through their victimhood status, just like feminists and LGBT. If we are suppose to be under equality of the law, why are they given special protection programs over other groups.
I see you have no problem calling out white supremacist, but you won't call out or let me point out Jewish supremacy. You accuse me of being antisemitic for point out the inordinate Jewish influence, does that mean I can call you anti-white for pointing out white supremist? Why this double standard? Do you hate white people?
Communism is as Jewish as National Socialism is German, but we have no problem pointing the latter
Thirdly, you haven't addressed my point, why does the term 'antisemitism' exist? Should other groups coin their own when they are persecuted, or perhaps create an excuse to virtue signal their victimhood status.
Kanye West is not wrong about the Jews.
I do hope you pull your head out of your arse and see the world for what it is. US is under Zionist, or Jewish supremacist, occupation.
In other words, you don't want to be challenged - live out your life as an ignorant person. You're no better than feminists who refuse to see the other side of the story.
Excellent . I've often suspected a strong Jewish backing for the feminist cult, as america is deeply matriarchal, which is spelt Jew. I'll try 2 avoid the circumcision connection....
Before there can be any тАШchallengeтАЩ there has to be agreement on a baseline set of facts, such as whether or not a major historical event occurred. Since that is not possible, there can be no debate. ItтАЩs futile.
I saw that. A couple of things. His account would likely test the limits of free speech on this platform. It could also, I would hope, test the old proposition that the answer to bad speech is more or better speech. If that proposition holds, his account should wither and die of its own accord, no censorship required. That would take direct and sustained engagement from people who oppose his beliefs. On the other hand, it might just be a magnet for like-minded folks and thrive. At least then, we'd see the darkness exposed to the light of day.
Firstly you missed so many points: what do you mean by racism? Do you believe in a multicultural utopia? Do you think different group racial/ethnic groups can live harmoniously within one border is a model for a successful civilisation? If yes, I'm afraid you cannot be any more wrong. Diversity is a source of conflict and tension; more diverse the nation is the lower the social cohesion and trust there is. The overall living standard is also greatly reduced. Moreover, the segregation worsens, because each group want to be with their own. I recommend reading Robert Putnam's 'Bowling Alone' on this.
Let alone, I haven't even touched on race differences in intelligence. Some groups are not as bright as others. This why low IQ nations are third world - regardless of how much charity we throw at it.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/28/us-racial-segregation-study-university-of-california-berkeley
Secondly, calling out antisemitism is not identity politics, but Jews are using it elevate themselves into higher echelon of society through their victimhood status, just like feminists and LGBT. If we are suppose to be under equality of the law, why are they given special protection programs over other groups.
I see you have no problem calling out white supremacist, but you won't call out or let me point out Jewish supremacy. You accuse me of being antisemitic for point out the inordinate Jewish influence, does that mean I can call you anti-white for pointing out white supremist? Why this double standard? Do you hate white people?
Communism is as Jewish as National Socialism is German, but we have no problem pointing the latter
Thirdly, you haven't addressed my point, why does the term 'antisemitism' exist? Should other groups coin their own when they are persecuted, or perhaps create an excuse to virtue signal their victimhood status.
Kanye West is not wrong about the Jews.
I do hope you pull your head out of your arse and see the world for what it is. US is under Zionist, or Jewish supremacist, occupation.
I should have listened to myself when I suggested that you not use this thread to make your points. Live and learn.
In other words, you don't want to be challenged - live out your life as an ignorant person. You're no better than feminists who refuse to see the other side of the story.
Excellent . I've often suspected a strong Jewish backing for the feminist cult, as america is deeply matriarchal, which is spelt Jew. I'll try 2 avoid the circumcision connection....
Before there can be any тАШchallengeтАЩ there has to be agreement on a baseline set of facts, such as whether or not a major historical event occurred. Since that is not possible, there can be no debate. ItтАЩs futile.
I suggested he open his own Substack and take his ideas there.
I saw that. A couple of things. His account would likely test the limits of free speech on this platform. It could also, I would hope, test the old proposition that the answer to bad speech is more or better speech. If that proposition holds, his account should wither and die of its own accord, no censorship required. That would take direct and sustained engagement from people who oppose his beliefs. On the other hand, it might just be a magnet for like-minded folks and thrive. At least then, we'd see the darkness exposed to the light of day.
Have heard of concrete thinkers? No matter what their beliefs are set in concrete and not even a jack hammer will make any difference.