Everyone and their brother knows Harris slept her way to the top in San Francisco. They haven't really tried to hide it, either.
But why was Kamala, a spectacular failure on the presidential campaign trail whom no one liked or voted for, chosen as the VP? The answer seems to be that she is totally without principal of any kind and will say or do literally anything her handlers tell her to with conviction. This includes transactional sex, which I'd venture to say many people don't have a problem with.
Young or otherwise hot women who use looks and sex to get what they want is a common occurrence and is generally applauded as clever and has been for a very long time. How to marry a millionaire and countless other movies and TV show women who know how to take advantage of the male ego and sex drive in a favorable and lighthearted light. And like actual prostitution, people seem to feel this is a personal moral issue, not a legal one.
But the reason Harris' case in particular and this type of behavior in general is not talked about in official media outlets is because the MSM are now essentially DNC propaganda outlets, and the DNC plank aligns with feminist ideologues 100%. Every else laughs about it, though.
It's the double standards that get to me: the consensus that a man who has a sexual relationship with a younger and less powerful women is "abusing" her, while a woman who has a sexual relationship with an older and less attractive man is legitimately pursuing her own interests. The Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky saga is a case in point: the consensus now seems to be that Bill acted badly, and Monica was a victimized innocent.
Everyone and their brother knows Harris slept her way to the top in San Francisco. They haven't really tried to hide it, either.
But why was Kamala, a spectacular failure on the presidential campaign trail whom no one liked or voted for, chosen as the VP? The answer seems to be that she is totally without principal of any kind and will say or do literally anything her handlers tell her to with conviction. This includes transactional sex, which I'd venture to say many people don't have a problem with.
Young or otherwise hot women who use looks and sex to get what they want is a common occurrence and is generally applauded as clever and has been for a very long time. How to marry a millionaire and countless other movies and TV show women who know how to take advantage of the male ego and sex drive in a favorable and lighthearted light. And like actual prostitution, people seem to feel this is a personal moral issue, not a legal one.
But the reason Harris' case in particular and this type of behavior in general is not talked about in official media outlets is because the MSM are now essentially DNC propaganda outlets, and the DNC plank aligns with feminist ideologues 100%. Every else laughs about it, though.
It's the double standards that get to me: the consensus that a man who has a sexual relationship with a younger and less powerful women is "abusing" her, while a woman who has a sexual relationship with an older and less attractive man is legitimately pursuing her own interests. The Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky saga is a case in point: the consensus now seems to be that Bill acted badly, and Monica was a victimized innocent.
Yes, logically it's a double standard.