While I do appreciate being truthful as it's freeing. I'm also sharp enough to know when an article on female sexual power dynamics isn't about women using sex to advance their careers.
I'm also mindful of how, in this article, VP Harris is described to be highly incompetent with praise overtones as an attorney. If we are very serious about any politician having or not having the skills necessary to run for office, hold office and execute that office, then VP Harris should be least of all on that list.
If she warrants such, so does any politician who fails Office.
This article is disguised as a discussion piece on female sexual power, but after the line, "...of course this is none of my business..." and the author continues with conjecture and more, it engraved a prior thought that this is a hit piece on the VP.
No thanks. Though I will NEVER be a part of the Democratic ticket again, this I ain't with either.
I think you have misunderstood. There is no "conjecture." VP Harris herself does not deny that as a young lawyer, she had a sexual affair with Willie Brown, 31 years her senior, and that during the time of the affair, she accepted two highly lucrative and influential appointments from him. A sane culture would acknowledge the corruption and call it what it was and is.
Granted. I concede only if it's a record. Still, I do not think this article is about female sexual power and its implications in the work place. I do appreciate having that honest conversation, but this article seems backed with animosity and something other than dealing with this issue in the work place.
While I do appreciate being truthful as it's freeing. I'm also sharp enough to know when an article on female sexual power dynamics isn't about women using sex to advance their careers.
I'm also mindful of how, in this article, VP Harris is described to be highly incompetent with praise overtones as an attorney. If we are very serious about any politician having or not having the skills necessary to run for office, hold office and execute that office, then VP Harris should be least of all on that list.
If she warrants such, so does any politician who fails Office.
This article is disguised as a discussion piece on female sexual power, but after the line, "...of course this is none of my business..." and the author continues with conjecture and more, it engraved a prior thought that this is a hit piece on the VP.
No thanks. Though I will NEVER be a part of the Democratic ticket again, this I ain't with either.
I think you have misunderstood. There is no "conjecture." VP Harris herself does not deny that as a young lawyer, she had a sexual affair with Willie Brown, 31 years her senior, and that during the time of the affair, she accepted two highly lucrative and influential appointments from him. A sane culture would acknowledge the corruption and call it what it was and is.
Granted. I concede only if it's a record. Still, I do not think this article is about female sexual power and its implications in the work place. I do appreciate having that honest conversation, but this article seems backed with animosity and something other than dealing with this issue in the work place.
Till then, good day.