I still get the impression we're somewhat at crossed purposes. You say "Anyway, I'm also sorry to tell you I find your arguments unconvincing" yet you didn't address any of my arguments in this reply. What you say is interesting, but it's all information that I already know and agree with so where's the disagreement?
Basically, the only thing I'm really arguing is that people CAN be wrong about a person's biological sex, even if infrequently and/or in brief encounters, whether they're trannies or not, and that a large number of trannies, if not most, WANT to be identified as trannies. They want to be CONSIDERED the opposite sex (or some weird non-binary gender) and treated that way, but they literally can't shut up about being trans. They're not trying to pass as Cisgendered males or females. They WANT people to know they're trannies.
I still get the impression we're somewhat at crossed purposes. You say "Anyway, I'm also sorry to tell you I find your arguments unconvincing" yet you didn't address any of my arguments in this reply. What you say is interesting, but it's all information that I already know and agree with so where's the disagreement?
Basically, the only thing I'm really arguing is that people CAN be wrong about a person's biological sex, even if infrequently and/or in brief encounters, whether they're trannies or not, and that a large number of trannies, if not most, WANT to be identified as trannies. They want to be CONSIDERED the opposite sex (or some weird non-binary gender) and treated that way, but they literally can't shut up about being trans. They're not trying to pass as Cisgendered males or females. They WANT people to know they're trannies.