Objective doesn't require belief, it requires acknowledgement because truth what it is not what we want it to be. You may as well go ahead and disregard gravity and believe you can fly off the 20th floor building.
Is calling women physically weaker than men stereotyping? Or is that grounded in biology? That's the objective truth.
That would also renders your argument fallacious if you're underpinning it by using the bible and Greeks historic text to claim women are not conformist.
My previous comment had nothing to do with past, I don't why you went off the rail there.
What is objective truth? Just because you believe that something is objective and true does not always mean that it is so.
Many things in the past that were believed to be "Objective truths" have as knowledge progresses been found not to be true or even factual.
You can believe what you want to believe to be true. Personally, I think you are looking at it through the lens of gender stereotyping.
Objective doesn't require belief, it requires acknowledgement because truth what it is not what we want it to be. You may as well go ahead and disregard gravity and believe you can fly off the 20th floor building.
Is calling women physically weaker than men stereotyping? Or is that grounded in biology? That's the objective truth.
Brad, you make no sense.
One of the problems associated with examining the past, is that we do it through the lens of our present perspective. It is called "presentism".
This is a pointless discussion as you have your concrete beliefs.
That would also renders your argument fallacious if you're underpinning it by using the bible and Greeks historic text to claim women are not conformist.
My previous comment had nothing to do with past, I don't why you went off the rail there.