Objective doesn't require belief, it requires acknowledgement because truth what it is not what we want it to be. You may as well go ahead and disregard gravity and believe you can fly off the 20th floor building.
Is calling women physically weaker than men stereotyping? Or is that grounded in biology? That's the objective truth.
That would also renders your argument fallacious if you're underpinning it by using the bible and Greeks historic text to claim women are not conformist.
My previous comment had nothing to do with past, I don't why you went off the rail there.
Objective doesn't require belief, it requires acknowledgement because truth what it is not what we want it to be. You may as well go ahead and disregard gravity and believe you can fly off the 20th floor building.
Is calling women physically weaker than men stereotyping? Or is that grounded in biology? That's the objective truth.
Brad, you make no sense.
One of the problems associated with examining the past, is that we do it through the lens of our present perspective. It is called "presentism".
This is a pointless discussion as you have your concrete beliefs.
That would also renders your argument fallacious if you're underpinning it by using the bible and Greeks historic text to claim women are not conformist.
My previous comment had nothing to do with past, I don't why you went off the rail there.