I can understand a desire to cheer on any woman who bravely steps up to speak out against the nonsense that has originated from feminism, but Ms Joyce only wants to push back with her own selfserving motives against the feminism that she bases her own ism on. She tends to talk fast and eloquently which can make it a challenge to catch her most outrageous statements as when in the abovementioned Boyce interview she claimed that unlike in the UK, trans identifying individuals have 'no rights' in the USA. In yet another interview cum book promotion tourstop, she asserted that one injustice of putting transwomen into women's prisons was that women don't belong in prisons because their crimes are less violent and they are usually involved with committing crimes with men who are by default the worse criminals. Such gynocentric statements get interspersed in otherwise sane statements against the excesses of trans activism but she herself is just pushing for her own excesses to retake center stage in the feminist drama that she has linked her career to
this take is backwards, it's not that social construction is some weird thing made up by feminists, rather it's that feminism is some weird thing made up by social constructionists.
I'm not cheering on any woman I am cheering on the advancement of the ideas, even in, as I said somewhere else in this thread 'the darkest pits of feminism'
I can understand a desire to cheer on any woman who bravely steps up to speak out against the nonsense that has originated from feminism, but Ms Joyce only wants to push back with her own selfserving motives against the feminism that she bases her own ism on. She tends to talk fast and eloquently which can make it a challenge to catch her most outrageous statements as when in the abovementioned Boyce interview she claimed that unlike in the UK, trans identifying individuals have 'no rights' in the USA. In yet another interview cum book promotion tourstop, she asserted that one injustice of putting transwomen into women's prisons was that women don't belong in prisons because their crimes are less violent and they are usually involved with committing crimes with men who are by default the worse criminals. Such gynocentric statements get interspersed in otherwise sane statements against the excesses of trans activism but she herself is just pushing for her own excesses to retake center stage in the feminist drama that she has linked her career to
this take is backwards, it's not that social construction is some weird thing made up by feminists, rather it's that feminism is some weird thing made up by social constructionists.
I'm not cheering on any woman I am cheering on the advancement of the ideas, even in, as I said somewhere else in this thread 'the darkest pits of feminism'