What a racquet. You have created a space where misogynists worship you in your own kingdom. Brilliant.
It’s the theatre of the absurd. Every guy is a victim. Hyperbole is rewarded. Buzz words like Nazi, misandry, socialist and communist are used with no applicable context. You stroke them like a pet and they roll over for a tummy rub knowing there is at least one woman who not only understands them, she has provided a safe space.
Janice, you have a great niche business because even a whore house has rules. No rules here. Like Richard Gere, in An Officer and a Gentleman, they have nowhere else to go.
I will give you credit for letting the likes of me post rebuttals. That’s something sites like Free Republic refuse to do.
Same thing happened in response to Janice's piece on Kamala Harris. All the dissenters simply hurled abuse and ranted about Trump, as if he was somehow relevant to the Brown/Harris affair. Lefties are all about ad hominem attacks, they're simply incapable of mounting arguments or addressing the actual subject matter. Paul Corrigan's post is a perfect example, it's just a series of personal insults.
The irrational vehemence and personal animosity in responses such as Paul's are revealing. He doesn't seem to realize that nobody cares what he feels when he demonstrates such an incapacity to mount an argument or restrain his rage.
Sadly, this perfectly describes feminists and their allies within Christianity. Their hatred and contempt for men and boys is as apparent there as anywhere else, and not only do they see themselves as “virtuous” for having the right hatreds as secular feminists do, they see themselves as virtuous in the Christian sense, and will blather about “love for God and neighbour”, “forgiveness” etc. from a moral highground.
Quite simply, to them males, and particularly the historically patriarchal church, are and always have been “oppressers”, so hatred of them is a Christian virtue.
Even now, in the era when most denominations have admitted women to all positions of power (er… “leadership”), they claim “oppression” as much as ever. Opposing the alleged “oppression” (with a “look at me”) is always a virtue and dissent is unmentionable.
Succinctly summed up as “The Christian churches are simp factories”. 😅
Yes, Stephen, but I think that you're referring to the many highly SECULARIZED Christian churches--which is to say, churches that seek legitimacy (and members) in a secular world by translating theology into the secular terms of fashionable political ideologies and even pop psychology. There are still a few Christian churches that have not succumbed to the seduction of secular ideologies, all of which promote hatred (a worldview that revolves around hatred and revenge) instead of love (a moral ideal of self-sacrificial love).
Hi Paul, while I agree with you about there still being churches that don't bow to secular ideology in order to fill pews (I attend one), there is still the problem of gynocentrism in the church as a whole. I've counseled several men who belong to more traditional churches who were summarily castigated and even ostracized by their clergy and congregations the moment the wife made complaints or accusations about them. I think it's fundamentally the same gynocentrism that underlies feminism. As they say, the safest thing that clergy can do from the pulpit is bash men and elevate women. That applies to every church I know about.
You can tell a hate movement by being as such because it deems itself righteous by the nature of, not its loves, but its hatreds.
By "nature of their hatreds" I do not suggest that any of them are capable of a righteous hatred of evil, for they are not .
But I submit that they deem who they hate as being the proper determinant of the righteousness of their hatred.
"Love your enemies?" God forbid!!
There is nothing more invigorating than hatred, even though the price is high and they will all pay it in due course
Feminism fits this to a T
Nicely said.
What a racquet. You have created a space where misogynists worship you in your own kingdom. Brilliant.
It’s the theatre of the absurd. Every guy is a victim. Hyperbole is rewarded. Buzz words like Nazi, misandry, socialist and communist are used with no applicable context. You stroke them like a pet and they roll over for a tummy rub knowing there is at least one woman who not only understands them, she has provided a safe space.
Janice, you have a great niche business because even a whore house has rules. No rules here. Like Richard Gere, in An Officer and a Gentleman, they have nowhere else to go.
I will give you credit for letting the likes of me post rebuttals. That’s something sites like Free Republic refuse to do.
Cheers!
You obviously don't know what a rebuttal is.
You haven't addressed anything in her article. You haven't even attempted to - just weird deflections about Trump and Fiamengo being married.
Same thing happened in response to Janice's piece on Kamala Harris. All the dissenters simply hurled abuse and ranted about Trump, as if he was somehow relevant to the Brown/Harris affair. Lefties are all about ad hominem attacks, they're simply incapable of mounting arguments or addressing the actual subject matter. Paul Corrigan's post is a perfect example, it's just a series of personal insults.
The irrational vehemence and personal animosity in responses such as Paul's are revealing. He doesn't seem to realize that nobody cares what he feels when he demonstrates such an incapacity to mount an argument or restrain his rage.
"I will give you credit for letting the likes of me post rebuttals."
Well done. You did at least write one sentence which could be considered relevant.
The feminist simp actually believes this stuff. No wonder the West is in trouble. Place is full of these types.
Sadly, this perfectly describes feminists and their allies within Christianity. Their hatred and contempt for men and boys is as apparent there as anywhere else, and not only do they see themselves as “virtuous” for having the right hatreds as secular feminists do, they see themselves as virtuous in the Christian sense, and will blather about “love for God and neighbour”, “forgiveness” etc. from a moral highground.
Quite simply, to them males, and particularly the historically patriarchal church, are and always have been “oppressers”, so hatred of them is a Christian virtue.
Even now, in the era when most denominations have admitted women to all positions of power (er… “leadership”), they claim “oppression” as much as ever. Opposing the alleged “oppression” (with a “look at me”) is always a virtue and dissent is unmentionable.
Succinctly summed up as “The Christian churches are simp factories”. 😅
I gave up on churches years ago: even the male-led churches fear women more than they fear God.
This is true. Even the ‘pastors’ obey their wives and women generally and ignore God.
True, but at least they hate other men!
There’s always some virtue in that!
lol
Yes, Stephen, but I think that you're referring to the many highly SECULARIZED Christian churches--which is to say, churches that seek legitimacy (and members) in a secular world by translating theology into the secular terms of fashionable political ideologies and even pop psychology. There are still a few Christian churches that have not succumbed to the seduction of secular ideologies, all of which promote hatred (a worldview that revolves around hatred and revenge) instead of love (a moral ideal of self-sacrificial love).
Hi Paul, while I agree with you about there still being churches that don't bow to secular ideology in order to fill pews (I attend one), there is still the problem of gynocentrism in the church as a whole. I've counseled several men who belong to more traditional churches who were summarily castigated and even ostracized by their clergy and congregations the moment the wife made complaints or accusations about them. I think it's fundamentally the same gynocentrism that underlies feminism. As they say, the safest thing that clergy can do from the pulpit is bash men and elevate women. That applies to every church I know about.