I think the problem is that university professors are unionized. Unions have become inseparably intertwined with feminist ideology and Marxist ideology. For example the student protests at U of T against Warren Farrell were endorsed by the union. Consequently the unionized university workforce gives a place of prominence to women's studies as it enforces their ideology. We need strict laws that prohibit unionized educational work forces such as university professors and teachers from promoting in any way union ideologies such as feminism.
Unions in an educational setting should be strictly confined to collective bargaining. If they want to promote ideologies they should only be permitted to do it through a registered political party such as the NDP.
I purchased your subscription because I have far more confidence in a woman defending men's rights than men themselves. Men are cowards when their reputations are a stake, and they sound pathetic in their efforts to defend their reputations, particularly in a sexual misconduct scandal. Just as men protected women from physical dangers throughout history, I think the time has come when women need to protect men from the social and psychological dangers of a democratic socialist society. I strongly endorse female leadership now, but it's got to be the right kind of leadership. One that has a higher moral vision to see that innocent people can be accused and convicted of crimes, and that even the guilty can be given grace, forgiveness and redemption. Women like you can give legions of men hope!
This is a very disturbing situation, when even opponents of feminism are afraid to speak the full truth.
As I read the list of suggestions, I was thinking that they're no help if the woman lies. One sad outcome of the continued expansion of the category of sex crime is that it creates such a huge pool it undermines the usefulness of sex offender registries.
Have you read 'Witches, Feminism and The Fall of The West' by Edward Dutton? Some eye opening stuff in that book. I highly recommend.
Appreciate the precision of your always welcome analysis!
I think the problem is that university professors are unionized. Unions have become inseparably intertwined with feminist ideology and Marxist ideology. For example the student protests at U of T against Warren Farrell were endorsed by the union. Consequently the unionized university workforce gives a place of prominence to women's studies as it enforces their ideology. We need strict laws that prohibit unionized educational work forces such as university professors and teachers from promoting in any way union ideologies such as feminism.
Unions in an educational setting should be strictly confined to collective bargaining. If they want to promote ideologies they should only be permitted to do it through a registered political party such as the NDP.
Hi Janice,
I purchased your subscription because I have far more confidence in a woman defending men's rights than men themselves. Men are cowards when their reputations are a stake, and they sound pathetic in their efforts to defend their reputations, particularly in a sexual misconduct scandal. Just as men protected women from physical dangers throughout history, I think the time has come when women need to protect men from the social and psychological dangers of a democratic socialist society. I strongly endorse female leadership now, but it's got to be the right kind of leadership. One that has a higher moral vision to see that innocent people can be accused and convicted of crimes, and that even the guilty can be given grace, forgiveness and redemption. Women like you can give legions of men hope!
This is a very disturbing situation, when even opponents of feminism are afraid to speak the full truth.
As I read the list of suggestions, I was thinking that they're no help if the woman lies. One sad outcome of the continued expansion of the category of sex crime is that it creates such a huge pool it undermines the usefulness of sex offender registries.