the "gynocracy"; the matriarchal hegemonic goal of hateful feminists
In Australia, Men are significant victims of violence, both by intimate (female) partners and generally, and their victimization and public vilification provokes almost no empathy or even recognition, if anything, it fans the feminist juggernaut to even greater outrageous power grabs and entitlement.
The level of hate speech by feminists in Australia is rising and government endorse. Extreme abhorrent claims like “kill all men” are now loudly lauded by their feminist sistas and enablers.
Thanks, Janice. The fact that feminists (as well as the anti-racists, anti-capitalists) are free to openly spew vicious opinions and false claims is something that can't be pointed out enough.
I don't object to their being free to spew -- it allows the rest of us to know who holds really awful views.
What's going on in Canada looks like your hate speech laws include a clause wherein the people who were the first to demand laws against hating another group get some sort of permanent exemption from prosecution under such laws.
Dec 17, 2022·edited Dec 18, 2022Liked by Janice Fiamengo
I hate (ironically) the hate speech laws. What one consider to be "hate" is another person's truth. Furthermore, it's poorly defined in law, which sounds deliberate as it is a clever disguise to dupe people into thinking it's there to serve the greater good, but in reality it's to control the narrative and what one can say. Even feminists have fallen to this trap by criticizing transsexuals that has resulted in their incarceration. However, this hate speech laws has certainly shown a lot of flaws and double standards: no feminists were arrested for their externalized misandry as you have already shown in your article.
We must all understand that roughly 80% of all people on this planet are disadvantaged in some way. Acts carried out to disadvantage people generally carry on with hurt feelings that manifest into some bias or prejudicial attitude. Groups form and carry out acts against other people who are just as disadvantaged as them, but in a different way. If you apply it to the 'Round Table' of history... the 20% of people who are not currently in the disadvantaged category elevate any group that can suppress another group. The 80% group ends up beating each other up because they are not mature enough to see that their acts will come around to hurt them. We are in an age of man bashing. Eventually, men will gather due to this and cause a Civil War. The men will die, the women will be violated... history will continue as it has for 5,000 years because people are simply not intelligent. People are one step away from going back to the jungle. I for one, am part of a group of Danes who were killed in 1002 AD. I am alive due only to the women of religion who kept my genes going. The reason... they want me to keep their intelligence alive. Yet, the same women keep my numbers low so as not to awaken what they destroyed so long ago. I feel sorry for myself, and for others. It's a sad world on both sides of the sexist equation. The same can be said for racist equations. When people get together great things happen. But, people are still prejudiced against the race called the Greats.
Has anyone ever filed criminal complaints with the Canadian police against the misandrist authors of these publications for their hate speech?
I agree that Claude Rochefort clearly committed no crime and his conviction is a result of feminist Gleichschaltung of the judicial branch of government.
I often wondered that myself. It is almost like there is total blindness to the issue. A big part of the problem is that we have gradually and insidiously been conditioned over the preceding decades.
Well I shall have to agree with Solanas that men are virtually on par with dogs. Dogs are, after all, a man's best friend. Plus they are more highly evolved and have a superior consciousness than any feminist I know of.
I just got your book, "Sons of Feminism: Men Have Their Say", today, too.
Thank you for doing all of this work.
For preparing us with the logical arguments, the words, the research to defend ourselves against this hateful force.
Growing up under this influence, I still witness glimmers of its effects on my behavior, reactions and mood - which can leave me feing a bit depressed and/or frustrated - even helpless.
However, your work brightens my day.
Happy New Years to you, Janice Fiamengo.
May the Wind Be at Your Back.
P.S. to anyone feeling burnt out, dissociative, unable to be present or to get into flow state or stuck in life - I've started to utilize somatic modalities of psychotherapy such as somatic experiencing, and have found it to be profoundly effective. Before that I did a year of regular talk therapy with internal family systems work, which was okay - but the somatic work has been way more impactful to me. Irene Lyon of irenelyon.com has been my teacher. She's fair and respectable. Somatic modalities teach trauma physiology, trauma as trapped survival stress and how to systematically release this stress via specific mindfulness exercises - asa result the nervous system can enter a truly deep parasympathetic low tone healing state. Based on the work of Dr. Peter Levine, Kathy Kain, Dr. Bessel Van Der Kolk, etc.
Apologies if this comes off as solicitous. I have no financial relationship with her. This Somatic Experiencing and other somatic modalities she teaches has helped me grow more resilient in a way that traditional talk therapy never even touched upon. If this resonates with anyone reading this - consider it's exploration.
That's the mistake of libertarians. Support the right of feminists to spew hate against boys and men, yet the feminists send police on men who merely criticize feminism. It's a losing proposition. The only way out of this feminist rot is an economic collapse or nuclear war.
Janice in one of your YouTube videos you spoke about in the 19th Century women got away with murder.
Another issue is discrimination in the courts of law and sentencing where research shows that women generally receive much lighter sentences than men when convicted of similar crimes.
Joseph Neuberger and Diane Davidson also discuss how some women are not held responsible for the consequences of their behaviour.
Speech is a behaviour. Everyone is capable of lying. Everyone is capable of error. The only effective remedy to bad speech is better speech.
Hate is an attitude. Everyone is capable of changing their minds. Even the world's best- paid psycho- babbler cannot perform Star Trek's Mind - Meld. No attribution of an attitude to another person can remotely be considered safe and definitive.
First of all, we have already reached peak higher education. Many institutions are closing their doors, affecting the female-majority student body to a greater extent than the remaining men. Most of the latter have gotten wise to the scam, and have bolted from college enrollment. Why spend $200K for a degree you might not even get to finish if you are expelled from school after “traumatizing” some co-ed by asking her for a date? Despite the faux complaints of women regarding the lack of men on campus, most feminists regard this as a feature, not a bug, as it clears the pipeline to positions of power and influence from male competition.
Second, the market for jobs requiring a degree is hardly growing. Cf. this piece, written in 2013:
I would find it hard to believe that the massive layoffs at Facebook and Twitter are limited to straight white males only. What are those girls affect going to do now? There simply aren’t a whole lot of jobs with six-figure salaries in corporate America for “critical queer studies” majors as “coordinators of diversity, equity, and sustainability”, or such other nonsense.
Third, male withdrawal from society is one thing as long as they’re left alone. When pursuit of female companionship is criminalized, more of them might react violently. Cf. Eliot Rodger, George Sodini, Marc Lepine, et al.
Fourth, the feminist state still requires male muscle to enforce its policy preferences, and men are withdrawing from this as well, as evidenced by shortfalls in military and law enforcement recruiting. Why should one put his life on the line as a soldier or a local cop when all the chiefs of police/sheriffs are female (many of them lesbians)?
Fifth, the perfection of reasonably priced sexbots in the next ten years will provide previously desperate men with an alternative. While such men would obviously prefer the real thing, substitutes will be a welcome relief, and that is why feminists react so viscerally to their adoption, because they want to demonstrate their sexual power by keeping as many men frustrated as possible. That is why you have the likes of Kathleen Richardson:
Sixth, expect more men to game the system by claiming membership in two newly privileged classes: gays and trannies. More Tootsies, more Chucks and Larrys.
Finally, in the long run, the barren feminist state will die off as it doesn’t reproduce, while more patriarchal societies—Muslims, Mormons, Orthodox Jews, survive and thrive. And note that the women in those communities are not precluded from pursuing professional careers. Those societies simply require family and children first.
Until all of this happens, one can only wonder how many lives (men, women, and children) have to be shattered in the process?
the "gynocracy"; the matriarchal hegemonic goal of hateful feminists
In Australia, Men are significant victims of violence, both by intimate (female) partners and generally, and their victimization and public vilification provokes almost no empathy or even recognition, if anything, it fans the feminist juggernaut to even greater outrageous power grabs and entitlement.
The level of hate speech by feminists in Australia is rising and government endorse. Extreme abhorrent claims like “kill all men” are now loudly lauded by their feminist sistas and enablers.
Wow, Janice is firing on all cylinders in this one! Bravo for calling out the real haters in our society.
Thanks, Janice. The fact that feminists (as well as the anti-racists, anti-capitalists) are free to openly spew vicious opinions and false claims is something that can't be pointed out enough.
I don't object to their being free to spew -- it allows the rest of us to know who holds really awful views.
What's going on in Canada looks like your hate speech laws include a clause wherein the people who were the first to demand laws against hating another group get some sort of permanent exemption from prosecution under such laws.
I hate (ironically) the hate speech laws. What one consider to be "hate" is another person's truth. Furthermore, it's poorly defined in law, which sounds deliberate as it is a clever disguise to dupe people into thinking it's there to serve the greater good, but in reality it's to control the narrative and what one can say. Even feminists have fallen to this trap by criticizing transsexuals that has resulted in their incarceration. However, this hate speech laws has certainly shown a lot of flaws and double standards: no feminists were arrested for their externalized misandry as you have already shown in your article.
We must all understand that roughly 80% of all people on this planet are disadvantaged in some way. Acts carried out to disadvantage people generally carry on with hurt feelings that manifest into some bias or prejudicial attitude. Groups form and carry out acts against other people who are just as disadvantaged as them, but in a different way. If you apply it to the 'Round Table' of history... the 20% of people who are not currently in the disadvantaged category elevate any group that can suppress another group. The 80% group ends up beating each other up because they are not mature enough to see that their acts will come around to hurt them. We are in an age of man bashing. Eventually, men will gather due to this and cause a Civil War. The men will die, the women will be violated... history will continue as it has for 5,000 years because people are simply not intelligent. People are one step away from going back to the jungle. I for one, am part of a group of Danes who were killed in 1002 AD. I am alive due only to the women of religion who kept my genes going. The reason... they want me to keep their intelligence alive. Yet, the same women keep my numbers low so as not to awaken what they destroyed so long ago. I feel sorry for myself, and for others. It's a sad world on both sides of the sexist equation. The same can be said for racist equations. When people get together great things happen. But, people are still prejudiced against the race called the Greats.
Has anyone ever filed criminal complaints with the Canadian police against the misandrist authors of these publications for their hate speech?
I agree that Claude Rochefort clearly committed no crime and his conviction is a result of feminist Gleichschaltung of the judicial branch of government.
I often wondered that myself. It is almost like there is total blindness to the issue. A big part of the problem is that we have gradually and insidiously been conditioned over the preceding decades.
The double standards.
Well I shall have to agree with Solanas that men are virtually on par with dogs. Dogs are, after all, a man's best friend. Plus they are more highly evolved and have a superior consciousness than any feminist I know of.
Well stated. Excellent arguments. I hope they are heard.
Fantastic work.
I just got your book, "Sons of Feminism: Men Have Their Say", today, too.
Thank you for doing all of this work.
For preparing us with the logical arguments, the words, the research to defend ourselves against this hateful force.
Growing up under this influence, I still witness glimmers of its effects on my behavior, reactions and mood - which can leave me feing a bit depressed and/or frustrated - even helpless.
However, your work brightens my day.
Happy New Years to you, Janice Fiamengo.
May the Wind Be at Your Back.
P.S. to anyone feeling burnt out, dissociative, unable to be present or to get into flow state or stuck in life - I've started to utilize somatic modalities of psychotherapy such as somatic experiencing, and have found it to be profoundly effective. Before that I did a year of regular talk therapy with internal family systems work, which was okay - but the somatic work has been way more impactful to me. Irene Lyon of irenelyon.com has been my teacher. She's fair and respectable. Somatic modalities teach trauma physiology, trauma as trapped survival stress and how to systematically release this stress via specific mindfulness exercises - asa result the nervous system can enter a truly deep parasympathetic low tone healing state. Based on the work of Dr. Peter Levine, Kathy Kain, Dr. Bessel Van Der Kolk, etc.
Apologies if this comes off as solicitous. I have no financial relationship with her. This Somatic Experiencing and other somatic modalities she teaches has helped me grow more resilient in a way that traditional talk therapy never even touched upon. If this resonates with anyone reading this - consider it's exploration.
That's the mistake of libertarians. Support the right of feminists to spew hate against boys and men, yet the feminists send police on men who merely criticize feminism. It's a losing proposition. The only way out of this feminist rot is an economic collapse or nuclear war.
I hope his lawyers have seen this.
Janice in one of your YouTube videos you spoke about in the 19th Century women got away with murder.
Another issue is discrimination in the courts of law and sentencing where research shows that women generally receive much lighter sentences than men when convicted of similar crimes.
Joseph Neuberger and Diane Davidson also discuss how some women are not held responsible for the consequences of their behaviour.
Speech is a behaviour. Everyone is capable of lying. Everyone is capable of error. The only effective remedy to bad speech is better speech.
Hate is an attitude. Everyone is capable of changing their minds. Even the world's best- paid psycho- babbler cannot perform Star Trek's Mind - Meld. No attribution of an attitude to another person can remotely be considered safe and definitive.
Hate speech is a lunatic concept.
How this eventually resolves itself:
First of all, we have already reached peak higher education. Many institutions are closing their doors, affecting the female-majority student body to a greater extent than the remaining men. Most of the latter have gotten wise to the scam, and have bolted from college enrollment. Why spend $200K for a degree you might not even get to finish if you are expelled from school after “traumatizing” some co-ed by asking her for a date? Despite the faux complaints of women regarding the lack of men on campus, most feminists regard this as a feature, not a bug, as it clears the pipeline to positions of power and influence from male competition.
Second, the market for jobs requiring a degree is hardly growing. Cf. this piece, written in 2013:
https://www.nber.org/papers/w18901
I would find it hard to believe that the massive layoffs at Facebook and Twitter are limited to straight white males only. What are those girls affect going to do now? There simply aren’t a whole lot of jobs with six-figure salaries in corporate America for “critical queer studies” majors as “coordinators of diversity, equity, and sustainability”, or such other nonsense.
Third, male withdrawal from society is one thing as long as they’re left alone. When pursuit of female companionship is criminalized, more of them might react violently. Cf. Eliot Rodger, George Sodini, Marc Lepine, et al.
Fourth, the feminist state still requires male muscle to enforce its policy preferences, and men are withdrawing from this as well, as evidenced by shortfalls in military and law enforcement recruiting. Why should one put his life on the line as a soldier or a local cop when all the chiefs of police/sheriffs are female (many of them lesbians)?
Fifth, the perfection of reasonably priced sexbots in the next ten years will provide previously desperate men with an alternative. While such men would obviously prefer the real thing, substitutes will be a welcome relief, and that is why feminists react so viscerally to their adoption, because they want to demonstrate their sexual power by keeping as many men frustrated as possible. That is why you have the likes of Kathleen Richardson:
https://campaignagainstsexrobots.wordpress.com/
Sixth, expect more men to game the system by claiming membership in two newly privileged classes: gays and trannies. More Tootsies, more Chucks and Larrys.
Finally, in the long run, the barren feminist state will die off as it doesn’t reproduce, while more patriarchal societies—Muslims, Mormons, Orthodox Jews, survive and thrive. And note that the women in those communities are not precluded from pursuing professional careers. Those societies simply require family and children first.
Until all of this happens, one can only wonder how many lives (men, women, and children) have to be shattered in the process?
Thanks for writing this!