Oct 18, 2022·edited Oct 18, 2022Liked by Janice Fiamengo
It is quite astounding the extent to which they really can't help themselves.
One would think that if they had a truth to tell they would not want it discredited by bad behaviour on their part.
But this they simply cannot do.
Has their hatred warped their tiny minds that far?
Are they such deluded hypocrites as to really think that their rage, which they imagine to be righteous is exempt from the strictures they would impose on others?
We see that feminism is a hate movement in and of its essence. And it is its theory that refutes the claim that some extremists hate because they are hateful people. No. they hate because feminist theory demands it
And except for lame appeals of sympathizers that "abusus non tollit usum" (look it up. google is still good for something) and passionate denials by adherents that they are a hate movement their actions and their theory - feminist theory most telling of all IMO - show us that they are a hate movement
What a terribly sad story. It reminds me of parents of a little tyrant who instead of setting a limit, simply allow the tyrant to always have his way. Chaos ensues. I think Robert Moore the Jungian Analyst called these people "highchair tyrants." Well named. So now we have a country filled with highchair tyrants and no men and fathers to set the limit. Hmmm I wonder how that is going to turn out?
Thanks Janice for bringing this to light. It's important to hear this sort of thing and to start to develop strategies to deal with these um, folks.
Janice you are one of the reasons i am still above ground. That Brock U. scene was an eye opener.
i was in a somewhat similar situation, well beyond school, where i was an Uber driver, and still male. young lady i was with was aggressive sexually, never pressed charges for anything and neither did i, but police fabricated a story, put it on tv and newspapers, fished for anyone that might have had a similar experience(no one called) and since then there is no one who cant google me and see what pigs did. Even my pubic defender had left his nads in his wifes purse.
it wont be long before i join the Brock U professor...
I was glad to read an objective article about Prof. Schimmelpenninck van der Oye. I find it very undeserving that now in 2024 the first Google results for him show "Brock cancels course" and "Ontario university cancels return to classroom".
Thank you for your hard work. I will be passing this on to as many MRA's as I can. Have a great day. Janet would you recommend reading Daphne Patai's "Heterophobia" and Katie Roiphe "The Morning After"?
Is the return of chaperone's coming soon? Maybe some older women could volunteer to shield today's young ladies from the traumatic experiences they might otherwise endure? You know, "stay safe" and all that. If young people with no risk of dying from Covid take the shot, why not protect themselves from real world dilemmas and tearful outcomes?
I have often thought that any handful of women who were interested in ending the witch hunt could do so in a week.
If it made even a single woman 'uncomfortable' to hear feminist rape rhetoric, she could complain that her womens study professor, by claiming that 'a female rape victim often goes back to her attacker, often responds as tho it were consensual' and such, was encouraging rape as a courtship method. She could say that it was directed at women on the basis of their sex, and that it created a hostile environment.
A fairness minded group of women could just walk through the halls, pointing at every male feminist, one after the other and demanding they be taken away. 'he looked at me', 'he's creepy', 'I am afraid of him'.
Every cop, every judge, fill the dockets, empty the court rooms and the patrol cars - every single one of them is guilty by the letter of the law.
Within a week or two we would see the return of a requirement for *some* evidence of wrongdoing, *some* evidence of harm. And the feminists would seethe and cry "This is why we can't have nice things"
A little off topic, but i am going to a 150th anniversary Reunion of my primary school this weekend. And i am meeting for lunch a lady for whom i had a crush when i was 12, (she was 11) back now 52 years ago and whom i have not clapped eyes on for 40 or more years though we have been emailing for the last 4 or 5 years.
Do i tell her I have rejected feminism in the name of honesty and disclosure
Or is discretion the better part of valour and peace a better goal.
After all I am not even evangelical in the sense of spreading the word about my own Christian faith, how much less am i as regards others of my beliefs and opinions
This is, as you say Janice, all too common - and has been happening for a few decades with increasing fever and frequency. Just recently I read about the experience of Thomas Oaster a Kansas University Professor who established the first International Men's Day in 1992 and in 3 subsequent years. Young female students of his, and some faculty members were furious at his desire to build an International Men's Day, which they viewed as an arrogant affront to the more urgent theme of women's liberation. In 1995 a case of sexual harassment was brought against Oaster by two of his students - the first student claiming he referred to her as "blondie" when she asked how she could improve her grades, and a second women who said she thought he was making sexual advances due to what she perceived as a "brief stroking motion" he made on her forearm.
The University penalized Oaster, restricted his movements on campus, and made his teaching ability so restricted that he had to resign. Many newspapers reported on him as a pervert who got his just deserts, and this publicity cast a shadow on his already planned next IMD conference which flopped when no one turned up. Thus he turned his back on the global movement he had successfully established. Oaster later proved his innocence and the university was forced to pay him I think it was 89 thousand dollars in compensation.
Fortunately IMD was revived again in 1999 by Jerome Teelucksingh of Trinidad and Tobago.
The effect of toxic feminism on full display, congratulations Janice. You're the only Canadian reporting I read. History will revere those who fought this evil socialist plague. When the righteous stand eventually He props them up to be a light in the darkness.
A Toronto cop warned me that even if I did not mention the teacher’s name in an email I sent to him, I can be charged for criminal libel if another cop reads the email.
Yet the Toronto media is allowed to mudsling accused men by name. Is Canada a country for men?
I first read about this type of thing happening in Daphne Patai's book "Heterophobia" and Katie Roiphe "The Morning After".
There has been a few cases mentioned in Quillette where the lives of academics are destroyed by the Universities Star chambers.
From what I can recall there have been a number Academics, mostly male, I believe who have passed away after facing these Kangaroo courts.
A thought I have had is that perhaps there should a record like an honour roll of the people who suffer such injustices.
It is quite astounding the extent to which they really can't help themselves.
One would think that if they had a truth to tell they would not want it discredited by bad behaviour on their part.
But this they simply cannot do.
Has their hatred warped their tiny minds that far?
Are they such deluded hypocrites as to really think that their rage, which they imagine to be righteous is exempt from the strictures they would impose on others?
We see that feminism is a hate movement in and of its essence. And it is its theory that refutes the claim that some extremists hate because they are hateful people. No. they hate because feminist theory demands it
And except for lame appeals of sympathizers that "abusus non tollit usum" (look it up. google is still good for something) and passionate denials by adherents that they are a hate movement their actions and their theory - feminist theory most telling of all IMO - show us that they are a hate movement
and that they really can't help themselves
What a terribly sad story. It reminds me of parents of a little tyrant who instead of setting a limit, simply allow the tyrant to always have his way. Chaos ensues. I think Robert Moore the Jungian Analyst called these people "highchair tyrants." Well named. So now we have a country filled with highchair tyrants and no men and fathers to set the limit. Hmmm I wonder how that is going to turn out?
Thanks Janice for bringing this to light. It's important to hear this sort of thing and to start to develop strategies to deal with these um, folks.
Such a familiar story. So many men taken down by such accusations, in countries all over the world.
Janice you are one of the reasons i am still above ground. That Brock U. scene was an eye opener.
i was in a somewhat similar situation, well beyond school, where i was an Uber driver, and still male. young lady i was with was aggressive sexually, never pressed charges for anything and neither did i, but police fabricated a story, put it on tv and newspapers, fished for anyone that might have had a similar experience(no one called) and since then there is no one who cant google me and see what pigs did. Even my pubic defender had left his nads in his wifes purse.
it wont be long before i join the Brock U professor...
I was glad to read an objective article about Prof. Schimmelpenninck van der Oye. I find it very undeserving that now in 2024 the first Google results for him show "Brock cancels course" and "Ontario university cancels return to classroom".
Thank you for your hard work. I will be passing this on to as many MRA's as I can. Have a great day. Janet would you recommend reading Daphne Patai's "Heterophobia" and Katie Roiphe "The Morning After"?
Is the return of chaperone's coming soon? Maybe some older women could volunteer to shield today's young ladies from the traumatic experiences they might otherwise endure? You know, "stay safe" and all that. If young people with no risk of dying from Covid take the shot, why not protect themselves from real world dilemmas and tearful outcomes?
"Narcity" a Toronto based newspaper for millennials? As in a contraction for "Narcissism City"? You just can't make this stuff up.
I have often thought that any handful of women who were interested in ending the witch hunt could do so in a week.
If it made even a single woman 'uncomfortable' to hear feminist rape rhetoric, she could complain that her womens study professor, by claiming that 'a female rape victim often goes back to her attacker, often responds as tho it were consensual' and such, was encouraging rape as a courtship method. She could say that it was directed at women on the basis of their sex, and that it created a hostile environment.
A fairness minded group of women could just walk through the halls, pointing at every male feminist, one after the other and demanding they be taken away. 'he looked at me', 'he's creepy', 'I am afraid of him'.
Every cop, every judge, fill the dockets, empty the court rooms and the patrol cars - every single one of them is guilty by the letter of the law.
Within a week or two we would see the return of a requirement for *some* evidence of wrongdoing, *some* evidence of harm. And the feminists would seethe and cry "This is why we can't have nice things"
A little off topic, but i am going to a 150th anniversary Reunion of my primary school this weekend. And i am meeting for lunch a lady for whom i had a crush when i was 12, (she was 11) back now 52 years ago and whom i have not clapped eyes on for 40 or more years though we have been emailing for the last 4 or 5 years.
Do i tell her I have rejected feminism in the name of honesty and disclosure
Or is discretion the better part of valour and peace a better goal.
After all I am not even evangelical in the sense of spreading the word about my own Christian faith, how much less am i as regards others of my beliefs and opinions
Thoughts?
This is, as you say Janice, all too common - and has been happening for a few decades with increasing fever and frequency. Just recently I read about the experience of Thomas Oaster a Kansas University Professor who established the first International Men's Day in 1992 and in 3 subsequent years. Young female students of his, and some faculty members were furious at his desire to build an International Men's Day, which they viewed as an arrogant affront to the more urgent theme of women's liberation. In 1995 a case of sexual harassment was brought against Oaster by two of his students - the first student claiming he referred to her as "blondie" when she asked how she could improve her grades, and a second women who said she thought he was making sexual advances due to what she perceived as a "brief stroking motion" he made on her forearm.
The University penalized Oaster, restricted his movements on campus, and made his teaching ability so restricted that he had to resign. Many newspapers reported on him as a pervert who got his just deserts, and this publicity cast a shadow on his already planned next IMD conference which flopped when no one turned up. Thus he turned his back on the global movement he had successfully established. Oaster later proved his innocence and the university was forced to pay him I think it was 89 thousand dollars in compensation.
Fortunately IMD was revived again in 1999 by Jerome Teelucksingh of Trinidad and Tobago.
The effect of toxic feminism on full display, congratulations Janice. You're the only Canadian reporting I read. History will revere those who fought this evil socialist plague. When the righteous stand eventually He props them up to be a light in the darkness.
A Toronto cop warned me that even if I did not mention the teacher’s name in an email I sent to him, I can be charged for criminal libel if another cop reads the email.
Yet the Toronto media is allowed to mudsling accused men by name. Is Canada a country for men?
Are you aware of this netflix documentary? Why do women think of themselves as such victims? Is it innate to these kind of women?
http://www.ascentofwoman.com/
The shrill puritan mob claims another victim. I wonder what percentage of male academics have now adopted 'Mike Pence rules.'