It seems there is no end to the increased possibility of female career advancement with current laws and litigation.
Once, a woman could use sex to climb the ladder by simply seducing the boss.
Now, it seems she can shift out any obstacles to her advancement by simply claiming she’s been “looked at” inappropriately or, creating a similar false allegation.No evidence is necessary and the feminists and simps will suspend or sack anyone in the way.
So, in addition to enforced ‘diversity and inclusion’ quotas and societal tokenism, women are slowly adding more tools to their career toolbox.
Someone needs to recognise this and put a stop to it. We’re destroying lives and weakening society by condemning our strongest to the rubbish heap.
Though I have now corrected the error, I will be unable to prevent any reader, whether supporter or detractor, from reporting that in a fit of self-righteous indignation, I wrote 'poo-poo' rather than 'pooh-pooh' about the ridiculous Forbes article (above) that blamed men for failing to properly mentor and support women post-MeToo.
I just read the Forbes article, what a fatuous piece indeed! But it reminded me that I once mentored a junior female who coveted my job, and white-anted me with my boss, an older married man. Soon they were having an affair and I found myself transferred to another department so she could have my job, a major promotion, leap-frogging far more senior applicants. Just another reason NEVER to mentor females!
After reading the story and comments, I was curious what was the rhyme that got SGA (I think I got the initials correct) panties in a wad, and realized it was the “rebel in the streets, not between the sheets,” that she was unwilling to fess up to. Those sensitivities seem to be problematic only in one direction as in all culture wars combat.
Since a comet is an obviously misogynous phallocentric rape symbol, the destruction can reasonably be attributed to toxic masculinity, which thought has brought Helen Pluckrose (who said women cannot be funny), James Lindsay and Peter Boghossian to mind.
the plans to intercept the comet with a rocket to save earth has been cancelled due to feminist protests against phallic constructions. POTUS has apologized and resigned for this mistake.
One has to especially appreciate the irony in the unspoken assertion that women are too weak to stand up for themselves and deserve special protections by all the "men are useless/anything he can do, she can do better" feminists.
Schroedinger's feminist: a woman is both "strong and independent" and "a perpetual victim" at the same time and she can choose whichever moniker allows her to benefit in any given situation.
"*Neo-Feminism agenda is derived from satanist ideology," says Mark Passio, former satanist priest, on Bitchute.com (YouTube competitor). Scroll down for the 15:35 summary video.
"Vast majority of women are being are being manipulated by this agenda to think that life is all about pleasure, comfort, and their daily pursuits. It's all about Me, Me, Me."
The reasons they have so much cultural power is because Demoralization of men by institutional powers and male pathetic sycophants (whom unfortunately seem to be the men who fucking run everything).
Totally agree Bettina. Reinforced this morning when I wake up to the news that the Australian government cabinet meeting will be focussed solely (again) on ending 'violence against women and children'. They will discuss plans to throw another circa $750M towards entrenching exactly that narrative and ensconcing a bureaucracy designed to perpetuate itself into eternity.
Ah... NO. In just released AU government spell today, it is still "women" with the occassional inclusion of "girls". In AU, boys over the age of 10 - 12 are excluded from DV shelters, of which there are over 500 for women and girls, but 0 for men and their children
Apparently because I resisted her continual assaulting of our children and me, in the woke AU FC, I was deemed to be the perpetrator... all in her best financial interests.
Tina, You are one of the few who are shining a light for fathers and parents of fathers in Australia. The systematic abuse of our children in pursuit of misandristic feminist narrative by our corrupt judiciary deserves to be prosecuted with the level of predujice it deserves; extreme. I view FC judges and registrars the same way as i view child traffickers and peadophiles; graves risks to children who should be removed from their posits with the level of predujice they justly deserve.
Prosecuting women who make false accusations actually discourages potential false accusations by other women as does legal punishment for all the other crimes.
Insist on believe in credible and verifiable evidence of a crime instead, as that has worked for adjudicating all alleged crimes since the Magna Carta and British Common Law for starters. Real facts are very powerful and dispositive things in getting to the truth, I have learned 71 years of living!
"No Joke Janice" should be required viewing at schools and universities throughout the Western world, if only our academic leaders had the intellectual fortitude and integrity to uphold their duty to social good rather than kowtowing to feminist propaganda.
It's clear that the entire "MeToo" movement was an attempt to re-assert the primacy of female victimhood when feminist leaders saw that millennials were questioning the hackneyed old mythologies at the heart of feminist bigotry, and particularly the idea that female victims matter more than anyone else. We had arrived at a moment for the first time in fifty years where feminists were being accused of sexism (even if the accusations pertained mostly to feminist attitudes toward trans women; their long-held sexist attitudes toward men would continue with impunity).
The hypocrisy of "MeToo" was especially apparent in its vigorous effort to prevent male victims from telling their stories. I was an EEO counselor for the U.S. Army at the height of MeToo. It was shocking how many servicemen were discouraged from telling their stories or filing complaints. When I mentioned at a training forum organized by the EEOC that "MeToo" was suppressing male voices and that its goals and motivations should be considered judiciously, I was attacked from all sides. It was hard to pretend that the movement cared in the slightest about stopping sexual harassment; it was solely interested in restoring focus on female victimhood and conditioning men to silently accept the role of oppressor that feminism wants to thrust on them.
Commenting briefly to paragraphs 1 and 3 of your composition.
1. We know that current 'academia' will not address this lower end of the fulcrum. What is stopping us from showing this video and others similar to the 'public at large' - something like Charlie Kirk does on campuses with Turning Point?
2. The 'patriarchy' allowed this to happen. You know, the manly men who would gladly kick out of a hospital bed the ass of a fellow combatant suffering from "soldier's fatigue". Men who have either engaged in ground battle, or can organize such events routinely support what you've described.
I don't know what a "manly man" is. I would like to believe it's a man who has the courage to resist and reject definitions or characterizations of manhood that are not in men's best interest. It has always intrigued me that women are depicted as "reclaiming" aspects of their womanhood that "the patriarchy" has stolen away from them if they venture into spheres of activity that have been traditionally reserved for men (and often feminist culture wants to overlook activities that are "reserved" for men primarily because male life is viewed as disposable, such as the "glass cellar" jobs that Warren Farrell describes); men, on the other hand, are told to "man up"--i.e. mindlessly abide by the standards of manhood that oppress them--if they even dare to question cultural restrictions on what a man is allowed to be.
I long ago stopped looking to the academy as an institution that will remedy abhorrently sexist practices that contravene any legitimate notion of social justice. It is so entrenched in its own delusions that I sometimes wonder if Plato was able to foresee the current, perverse relationship between feminism and the academy when he developed his cave metaphor.
Yes, but it's a different culture now. The prohibitions are in place (see my "We're All Terrorists Now" essay) and any man who attempts to spread the truth is liable to be accused of sexual harassment, assault, or violent extremism. But yes, we must resist as we are able.
I left the U.S. long ago, partly based on a series of false allegations from vindictive, resentful, empowered women. Was jailed once for daring to respond verbally. Words are now 'violence', you see.
Outta that evil place. Ain't ever going hom . . . back.
If we accept Schoenewolf’s gender narcissism thesis as the basis to feminists and therefore feminism, in the feminist-influenced legal system—we can’t honestly call it a justice system—we can discern the pathological need for women to either be at least imagined victims of not actual victims of rape and other crimes, and it unconsciously works to achieve such ends.
Gender narcissistic mirroring at the social level.
The cops, courts, and government all collude in this, and the money keeps flowing away from men and to police departments, courthouses, and gubbermint scams.
Until or unless the punishment of demonstrably false allegations becomes more prevalent (or, dare I say, “normalized”), there’s probably not much reason to be overly optimistic.
It’s not particularly complicated when examining the issue from an incentive, cost/benefit perspective. At present, women stand to gain far more than they stand to lose when they fabricate an allegation of sexual assault or misconduct. This has been the case for an extended period of time now.
One of the most simple rebuttals of the notion that we live in a “rape culture” is how rapists tend to be treated in prison.
It’s one thing to be viewed as the preeminent piece of proverbial shit in polite, civilized society. It another thing entirely to be viewed as the preeminent piece of proverbial shit in the place where society keeps all of its various other pieces of proverbial shit.
People are unlikely to ever view false accusation of rape as being on-par with the actual commission of rape in terms of severity, however, the societal status quo is a veritable breeding ground and feeding frenzy for unscrupulous women who are willing to take minimal risk to toss an allegation.
Society will probably never adopt the “accuser receives the same sentence the accused would have” standard, but until there is a narrowing of the gap between the level of depravity society associates with rape and the willful, malicious accusation of it, there likely will be no change taking place.
Of course, such change would require that the broader society care more about men shedding blood than women shedding tears (the very essence of gynocentrism), but that’s equally unlikely.
Gangs in and out of prisons often do terrible things to rapists.
Just goes to show how the dehumanization of men has no relation to the real nature of men, who have moral compasses just like everyone else even when they go career criminal.
This will stop when judges grow a pair and have female in question charged with perjury and sentenced to equal (or greater time) for attempting ruin another persons life, even though the charge alone will follow him forever.
. . . and many modern women know that they will suffer zero consequences for the evil they do. When people have nothing to lose and everything to gain, most will do as they please and rationalize it later.
Fair enough. We know there are vast differences in exterior morphology between men and women, and huge brain differences also. These, certainly, affect cognition, understanding, expression, and of course reasoning ability on many fronts. We also know the female in general is much more susceptible to conditioning, propaganda, and social/group pressure to conform.
This, of course, does not excuse selfish or predatory behavior in either male or female. Adults ultimately are responsible for their actions and decisions. cheers, m
The "Restoring the Presumption of Innocence" conference recieved very little coverage in the main stream media.
It is like the media avoided covering the event. I watched it online and it is scary what can happen to innocent men who get caught up in this whirlpool.
Tnx for linking to the Weinstein ruling in NYC. And per your/ Bettina Arndt's comments just look at what Judge Madeline Singas had to say (copied below) in her "stinging" dissent. Imagine a judge refusing to overturn a patently and inarguably wrong conviction for say, bank robbery, on the basis that overturning the decision would endanger bank customers. Hopefully there would be outrage? Maybe not.
In a stinging dissent, Judge Madeline Singas wrote that the Court of Appeals was continuing a “disturbing trend of overturning juries’ guilty verdicts in cases involving sexual violence.” She said the ruling came at “the expense and safety of women.”
May Judge Madeline Singas children be false accused and held to account and may their appeals be rejected in the "Best interest of the Legal Industrial Complex" so that this bench bit*h and her brethren learn that they and their children can be sacrificial fodder in pursuit of feminist ideology.
I don't think the empathy gap is as biological as people think.
I think its maintained by a culture of intense misandry which slander and character assassinate men on the daily.
It's easy to feel no empathy for someone when you are continually told that they wanna rape anally rape babies and beat their wives to death, even if it registers only subconsciously.
I agree that it's caused by relentless anti-male propaganda. There is no biological reason for men to be totally disregarded. Men are essential to a flourishing society.
I read this article, and you're wrong, it's not an example of gender empathy gap. It's just a report on the impact of war on the dating scene in Ukraine. It does not portray women as victims while ignoring men's suffering. Quite the opposite, as one woman asks: “Why do our men have to suffer so much when women can just go abroad and have a martini in Milan?” Ukrainian women are not whining feminist bitches like our Western women, please do not put them in that category.
A friend just sent me the following, which provides startling insight into one powerful male Democrat's views on the issue. This is Jared Polis, now the Governor of Colorado, stating that male students accused of sexual misconduct should all be expelled because a few of them are likely guilty: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/social-justice-math-better-eight-innocent-men-be-punished-one-or-two-guilty-men-go/
Omg. Unbelievable!
Replace 'men' by 'jews' or 'blacks' or anything else.
This would be political suicide. But I have a doubt that said against men could actually fly. Sickening.
It seems there is no end to the increased possibility of female career advancement with current laws and litigation.
Once, a woman could use sex to climb the ladder by simply seducing the boss.
Now, it seems she can shift out any obstacles to her advancement by simply claiming she’s been “looked at” inappropriately or, creating a similar false allegation.No evidence is necessary and the feminists and simps will suspend or sack anyone in the way.
So, in addition to enforced ‘diversity and inclusion’ quotas and societal tokenism, women are slowly adding more tools to their career toolbox.
Someone needs to recognise this and put a stop to it. We’re destroying lives and weakening society by condemning our strongest to the rubbish heap.
Though I have now corrected the error, I will be unable to prevent any reader, whether supporter or detractor, from reporting that in a fit of self-righteous indignation, I wrote 'poo-poo' rather than 'pooh-pooh' about the ridiculous Forbes article (above) that blamed men for failing to properly mentor and support women post-MeToo.
I just read the Forbes article, what a fatuous piece indeed! But it reminded me that I once mentored a junior female who coveted my job, and white-anted me with my boss, an older married man. Soon they were having an affair and I found myself transferred to another department so she could have my job, a major promotion, leap-frogging far more senior applicants. Just another reason NEVER to mentor females!
The 2006 Duke Lacrosse scandal was patient zero of this scourge. No one from the media, academia, and justice system was held accountable except the DA. Name and shame the rape hoaxers who make life worse for all women and men: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/duke-lacrosse-scandal-nifong-msm-groupof88
The false accuser from that case was not given jail time. She later would murder someone. Oops.
It goes back much further than that...see Silva vs. University of New Hampshire 1994.
After reading the story and comments, I was curious what was the rhyme that got SGA (I think I got the initials correct) panties in a wad, and realized it was the “rebel in the streets, not between the sheets,” that she was unwilling to fess up to. Those sensitivities seem to be problematic only in one direction as in all culture wars combat.
Headline from tomorrow's Galactic Gazette:
'Earth Destroyed by Massive Comet! All Life Wiped Out!'
subhead tag: 'Women Hardest Hit!!'
"Men and patriarchal thought are believed to have caused the comet to crash into Earth's atmosphere."
Since a comet is an obviously misogynous phallocentric rape symbol, the destruction can reasonably be attributed to toxic masculinity, which thought has brought Helen Pluckrose (who said women cannot be funny), James Lindsay and Peter Boghossian to mind.
the plans to intercept the comet with a rocket to save earth has been cancelled due to feminist protests against phallic constructions. POTUS has apologized and resigned for this mistake.
lol well-played
Aargh! How'd I miss that tag. :O)
That fits wonderfully, thank you PGH.
I wish this was satire....
But this was quite literally what was said by some articles about covid.
Quite horrific tbh, no matter how overdone it is.
One has to especially appreciate the irony in the unspoken assertion that women are too weak to stand up for themselves and deserve special protections by all the "men are useless/anything he can do, she can do better" feminists.
Schroedinger's feminist: a woman is both "strong and independent" and "a perpetual victim" at the same time and she can choose whichever moniker allows her to benefit in any given situation.
I despise feminists! They're insufferable hypocrites.
If they were only that, it would (almost) be funny.
But it’s much more and in the end they really are extremely harmful to society and it’s really not funny at all in the end.
"*Neo-Feminism agenda is derived from satanist ideology," says Mark Passio, former satanist priest, on Bitchute.com (YouTube competitor). Scroll down for the 15:35 summary video.
"Vast majority of women are being are being manipulated by this agenda to think that life is all about pleasure, comfort, and their daily pursuits. It's all about Me, Me, Me."
Feminists know they are hypocrites.
They just don't care.
I think women really are weak tbh.
The reasons they have so much cultural power is because Demoralization of men by institutional powers and male pathetic sycophants (whom unfortunately seem to be the men who fucking run everything).
I wish we were seeing a real change in attitudes towards false allegations but it is certainly yet to happen in Australia.
This is sadly still the prevailing ethos: “Better ten innocent men go to jail than one potential female victim hesitate to come forward.”
Totally agree Bettina. Reinforced this morning when I wake up to the news that the Australian government cabinet meeting will be focussed solely (again) on ending 'violence against women and children'. They will discuss plans to throw another circa $750M towards entrenching exactly that narrative and ensconcing a bureaucracy designed to perpetuate itself into eternity.
Ha! Here in the UK the current sound bite is “..violence against women and girls..”
You’re lucky to have young boys included in your government’s focus.
Ah... NO. In just released AU government spell today, it is still "women" with the occassional inclusion of "girls". In AU, boys over the age of 10 - 12 are excluded from DV shelters, of which there are over 500 for women and girls, but 0 for men and their children
Apparently because I resisted her continual assaulting of our children and me, in the woke AU FC, I was deemed to be the perpetrator... all in her best financial interests.
Tina, You are one of the few who are shining a light for fathers and parents of fathers in Australia. The systematic abuse of our children in pursuit of misandristic feminist narrative by our corrupt judiciary deserves to be prosecuted with the level of predujice it deserves; extreme. I view FC judges and registrars the same way as i view child traffickers and peadophiles; graves risks to children who should be removed from their posits with the level of predujice they justly deserve.
Prosecuting women who make false accusations actually discourages potential false accusations by other women as does legal punishment for all the other crimes.
This is simple good sense.
And what do we do with 'believe all women'?
Insist on believe in credible and verifiable evidence of a crime instead, as that has worked for adjudicating all alleged crimes since the Magna Carta and British Common Law for starters. Real facts are very powerful and dispositive things in getting to the truth, I have learned 71 years of living!
But... but... female supremacy cannot survive with your approach!
Correct! That’s the plan. After all, America is all about equal treatment under the law, isn’t it? Who can object to that!
Ask Emmett Till,
"No Joke Janice" should be required viewing at schools and universities throughout the Western world, if only our academic leaders had the intellectual fortitude and integrity to uphold their duty to social good rather than kowtowing to feminist propaganda.
It's clear that the entire "MeToo" movement was an attempt to re-assert the primacy of female victimhood when feminist leaders saw that millennials were questioning the hackneyed old mythologies at the heart of feminist bigotry, and particularly the idea that female victims matter more than anyone else. We had arrived at a moment for the first time in fifty years where feminists were being accused of sexism (even if the accusations pertained mostly to feminist attitudes toward trans women; their long-held sexist attitudes toward men would continue with impunity).
The hypocrisy of "MeToo" was especially apparent in its vigorous effort to prevent male victims from telling their stories. I was an EEO counselor for the U.S. Army at the height of MeToo. It was shocking how many servicemen were discouraged from telling their stories or filing complaints. When I mentioned at a training forum organized by the EEOC that "MeToo" was suppressing male voices and that its goals and motivations should be considered judiciously, I was attacked from all sides. It was hard to pretend that the movement cared in the slightest about stopping sexual harassment; it was solely interested in restoring focus on female victimhood and conditioning men to silently accept the role of oppressor that feminism wants to thrust on them.
Commenting briefly to paragraphs 1 and 3 of your composition.
1. We know that current 'academia' will not address this lower end of the fulcrum. What is stopping us from showing this video and others similar to the 'public at large' - something like Charlie Kirk does on campuses with Turning Point?
2. The 'patriarchy' allowed this to happen. You know, the manly men who would gladly kick out of a hospital bed the ass of a fellow combatant suffering from "soldier's fatigue". Men who have either engaged in ground battle, or can organize such events routinely support what you've described.
I don't know what a "manly man" is. I would like to believe it's a man who has the courage to resist and reject definitions or characterizations of manhood that are not in men's best interest. It has always intrigued me that women are depicted as "reclaiming" aspects of their womanhood that "the patriarchy" has stolen away from them if they venture into spheres of activity that have been traditionally reserved for men (and often feminist culture wants to overlook activities that are "reserved" for men primarily because male life is viewed as disposable, such as the "glass cellar" jobs that Warren Farrell describes); men, on the other hand, are told to "man up"--i.e. mindlessly abide by the standards of manhood that oppress them--if they even dare to question cultural restrictions on what a man is allowed to be.
I long ago stopped looking to the academy as an institution that will remedy abhorrently sexist practices that contravene any legitimate notion of social justice. It is so entrenched in its own delusions that I sometimes wonder if Plato was able to foresee the current, perverse relationship between feminism and the academy when he developed his cave metaphor.
Beautifully said, thank you.
Yes, but it's a different culture now. The prohibitions are in place (see my "We're All Terrorists Now" essay) and any man who attempts to spread the truth is liable to be accused of sexual harassment, assault, or violent extremism. But yes, we must resist as we are able.
Bravo! Here's the link to the 2017 video: https://fiamengofile.substack.com/p/the-victim-is-always-female
And here's today's DAVIA press release, "False Allegations Have Become a Cancer Around the World": https://endtodv.org/pr/false-allegations-have-become-a-cancer-around-the-world/
I left the U.S. long ago, partly based on a series of false allegations from vindictive, resentful, empowered women. Was jailed once for daring to respond verbally. Words are now 'violence', you see.
Outta that evil place. Ain't ever going hom . . . back.
So sorry to hear.
If we accept Schoenewolf’s gender narcissism thesis as the basis to feminists and therefore feminism, in the feminist-influenced legal system—we can’t honestly call it a justice system—we can discern the pathological need for women to either be at least imagined victims of not actual victims of rape and other crimes, and it unconsciously works to achieve such ends.
Gender narcissistic mirroring at the social level.
The cops, courts, and government all collude in this, and the money keeps flowing away from men and to police departments, courthouses, and gubbermint scams.
Until or unless the punishment of demonstrably false allegations becomes more prevalent (or, dare I say, “normalized”), there’s probably not much reason to be overly optimistic.
It’s not particularly complicated when examining the issue from an incentive, cost/benefit perspective. At present, women stand to gain far more than they stand to lose when they fabricate an allegation of sexual assault or misconduct. This has been the case for an extended period of time now.
One of the most simple rebuttals of the notion that we live in a “rape culture” is how rapists tend to be treated in prison.
It’s one thing to be viewed as the preeminent piece of proverbial shit in polite, civilized society. It another thing entirely to be viewed as the preeminent piece of proverbial shit in the place where society keeps all of its various other pieces of proverbial shit.
People are unlikely to ever view false accusation of rape as being on-par with the actual commission of rape in terms of severity, however, the societal status quo is a veritable breeding ground and feeding frenzy for unscrupulous women who are willing to take minimal risk to toss an allegation.
Society will probably never adopt the “accuser receives the same sentence the accused would have” standard, but until there is a narrowing of the gap between the level of depravity society associates with rape and the willful, malicious accusation of it, there likely will be no change taking place.
Of course, such change would require that the broader society care more about men shedding blood than women shedding tears (the very essence of gynocentrism), but that’s equally unlikely.
"One of the most simple rebuttals of the notion that we live in a “rape culture” is how rapists tend to be treated in prison."
Rape Culture was originally a 1974 movie/documentary about the rape of males in prisons.
Gangs in and out of prisons often do terrible things to rapists.
Just goes to show how the dehumanization of men has no relation to the real nature of men, who have moral compasses just like everyone else even when they go career criminal.
This will stop when judges grow a pair and have female in question charged with perjury and sentenced to equal (or greater time) for attempting ruin another persons life, even though the charge alone will follow him forever.
Is that gonna happen? You know it isn’t…
Women live in a world without consequence
. . . and many modern women know that they will suffer zero consequences for the evil they do. When people have nothing to lose and everything to gain, most will do as they please and rationalize it later.
I don't think most women are even conscious of what they're doing because their faculty for moral reasoning is so impaired.
Fair enough. We know there are vast differences in exterior morphology between men and women, and huge brain differences also. These, certainly, affect cognition, understanding, expression, and of course reasoning ability on many fronts. We also know the female in general is much more susceptible to conditioning, propaganda, and social/group pressure to conform.
This, of course, does not excuse selfish or predatory behavior in either male or female. Adults ultimately are responsible for their actions and decisions. cheers, m
The "Restoring the Presumption of Innocence" conference recieved very little coverage in the main stream media.
It is like the media avoided covering the event. I watched it online and it is scary what can happen to innocent men who get caught up in this whirlpool.
Don't forget about baseball player Trevor Bauer.
What happened to him was sick, and even though his innocence was clearly proven, he has yet to recover.
Tnx for linking to the Weinstein ruling in NYC. And per your/ Bettina Arndt's comments just look at what Judge Madeline Singas had to say (copied below) in her "stinging" dissent. Imagine a judge refusing to overturn a patently and inarguably wrong conviction for say, bank robbery, on the basis that overturning the decision would endanger bank customers. Hopefully there would be outrage? Maybe not.
In a stinging dissent, Judge Madeline Singas wrote that the Court of Appeals was continuing a “disturbing trend of overturning juries’ guilty verdicts in cases involving sexual violence.” She said the ruling came at “the expense and safety of women.”
May Judge Madeline Singas children be false accused and held to account and may their appeals be rejected in the "Best interest of the Legal Industrial Complex" so that this bench bit*h and her brethren learn that they and their children can be sacrificial fodder in pursuit of feminist ideology.
That’s undiluted, frankly criminal, misandry.
It's incredible, thank you.
It's the gender Empathy Gap: no concern for men, but endless concern for women.
Men's ruined lives are less newsworthy than women's minor inconveniences. One sees it everywhere.
There was a classic example last month in the New York Times...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/04/world/europe/ukraine-war-dating.html
As Janice says, the victim is always female...
I don't think the empathy gap is as biological as people think.
I think its maintained by a culture of intense misandry which slander and character assassinate men on the daily.
It's easy to feel no empathy for someone when you are continually told that they wanna rape anally rape babies and beat their wives to death, even if it registers only subconsciously.
I mean it happened to jews in nazi Germany.
I agree that it's caused by relentless anti-male propaganda. There is no biological reason for men to be totally disregarded. Men are essential to a flourishing society.
I read this article, and you're wrong, it's not an example of gender empathy gap. It's just a report on the impact of war on the dating scene in Ukraine. It does not portray women as victims while ignoring men's suffering. Quite the opposite, as one woman asks: “Why do our men have to suffer so much when women can just go abroad and have a martini in Milan?” Ukrainian women are not whining feminist bitches like our Western women, please do not put them in that category.